Summary: he authors contended that Church, Stapleton, Yang, and Gallo's meta-analytic finding that acupoint tapping had specific therapeutic benefit was highly flawed, both statistically and methodologically.
In this article, the authors are clarifying and addressing their methodological concerns, criticizing the responses provided by Church et al., and reaffirming their original concerns about the flawed findings. This type of article is common in academic journals, where researchers engage in debates and discussions about the validity and interpretation of research findings.
Citation and Link: Spielmans, G. & Rosen, G. (2022). Corrigendum compounds errors and again fails to support the specificity of acupoint tapping. J Nerv Ment Dis, 210(2): 139-42.
Read the Original Source at Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease