Content-free processing can be a useful approach for EFT practitioners in certain contexts, such as when an incident feels too sensitive for the client to speak about or when confidentiality concerns exist. In this article, I'll share how and why I've incorporated this approach into my practice.
Before I begin, one note about the terminology: "Content-free" is a slightly misleading term because it’s not totally content-free; if it was, we might as well call it meditation. Perhaps a better way to describe it is working in such a way that does not require the client to disclose the details of their story in order to process it. This may sound similar to the Tearless Trauma technique often deployed in EFT, and it is similar! Working content-free doesn't only apply to trauma, though, which is why I've expanded the technique into an option for use with all my clients.
How Does Content-Free Processing Work in EFT?
The client explains that they had an experience they’re not comfortable disclosing the details of. The practitioner will ask them to share what they do feel comfortable saying, which may include a broad description such as, "When I was in the military, I was given an order to do something that I’m ashamed of." Sometimes all the client can say is, "I just can’t talk about it."
The facilitator will focus on a physical sensation like the throat closing up or an emotion like guilt, shame, or fear. The client can give the experience a title like, "This awful situation." This vagueness puts distance between the client and the event, which is a helpful form of intentional dissociation, just like in Tearless Trauma.
Starting with one aspect at a time like always, the client may describe a sensory trigger and we tap on that. I don’t need to know why the sound of giggling (for example) is associated with this experience. My client knows why, and they're feeling the stress response, so it’s not necessary for me to know more. Technically, I don’t even need to know that it’s the sound of giggling we’re dealing with; it would be sufficient to start tapping on "this sound that I can't describe."
Once that’s discharged, we may move on to an emotion like fear or shame. While we work, we’re constantly checking what’s shifting, what’s coming up, whether the client is feeling overwhelmed—making sure they’re feeling safe because I’m not in there with them, so I have to rely on my perception and intuition.
Why Would Someone Work Content-Free?
There are several reasons this approach is beneficial. Sometimes we’re too ashamed of an experience to talk about it; other times, we’re too traumatized. Often, clients have tried talk therapy before where they’ve recounted the same painful story over and over and they just can't do it again. If a client isn’t doing the work in their native language, it can be challenging to find the right words, and it can be more effective to work content-free in these cases. In some situations, the practitioner may prefer not to know the details of an event for certain reasons.
Then there's the issue of confidentiality. Many professionals are legally bound to report certain things. This fact alone prevents many people from seeking help for fear that their story will not be kept confidential. Working content-free can ensure that a client feels safe while still giving them the opportunity to process. Likewise, many who work in professions where they are obliged to keep information confidential or classified—such as military personnel, doctors, therapists, and lawyers—often experience secondary trauma.
Personally, I love working content-free because it forces me to be creative. It's the harder route for the facilitator, without a doubt, but I enjoy the challenge. Content-free work hones my sensory acuity and makes me a better healer because it improves my ability to read the body and interpret language on a higher level.
For practitioners working content-free, the question might arise of whether there is any reason to move on to having the client tell the story out loud. Telling the story can be hugely healing if part of the trauma relates to the shame or pressure one feels to keep it secret. For example, often abuse victims are told to keep the events a secret because no one will believe them or because there will be repercussions. When this is the case, getting to a point where the client can share their story is a significant breakthrough. And yet, if this doesn’t happen, that’s okay too; it doesn't mean the process is a failure.
A Note on Safety
If you’re working content-free, it’s essential to be at least trauma-informed and ideally trauma-trained. The client will be alone in their internal experience, which isn’t always a safe place so for a facilitator to work with limited visibility; they need to know how to keep their clients safe.
______________________________________________________________________________
Kristin Panasewicz is a London-based advanced certified accredited EFT practitioner who specializes in shame, trauma, and complex issues.
Image credit: Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash
Share Your Comments & Feedback